National / International News

Girl asks Queen to stop her eviction

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 15:36
People living in properties owned by the Crown, including a 12-year-old girl, are campaigning against being evicted from their homes.

Do bacteria hold key to weight loss?

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 15:29
Do bacteria hold the key to weight loss?

Thatcher warned of WW2 codebreaker

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 15:25
Margaret Thatcher was warned a former codebreaker had become a security threat with his memoirs' publication, newly released documents show.

Motorcycle pioneer finally honoured

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 15:21
The maker of a motorbike made world-famous by Lawrence of Arabia is finally honoured in his home city of Nottingham.

A UK-based American tells the US what to expect from Primark

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 15:12
What can US shoppers expect from their first Primark?

New city transport museum opens

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 15:05
A new museum of transport featuring classic cars, buses and emergency service vehicles from around Tayside has opened in Dundee.

VIDEO: The flying robotic pop band

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 15:00
A team of US robotics experts has programmed a squadron of drones to play live music.

VIDEO: Baby deer 'no bigger than a hamster'

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 14:27
A baby Java mouse-deer, one of the smallest hoofed animals in the world, has been born at the Bioparc Fuengirola zoo in southern Spain.

Canada orders sex misconduct review

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 14:16
Canada's military orders an internal review after publication of a report showing sexual assault is rampant in the country's armed forces.

Coal ash = environmental win (when you recycle it)

Marketplace - American Public Media - Fri, 2014-04-25 14:12
Monday, April 28, 2014 - 16:21 Dan Weissmann

Steve Fleming, technical director for the Chicago-area concrete manufacturer Prairie Materials, stands in front of the concrete-mixing plant at the firm's home office. Prairie Materials uses about 100,000 tons of coal fly ash in its concrete every year.

Coal ash jumped into the headlines this year when a pond maintained by Duke Energy spilled into the Dan River in North Carolina. It fouled the water supply, and brought national scrutiny to what sounded like a huge, and largely unregulated source of toxic waste.

The same week, to much less fanfare, the Environmental Protection Agency announced that it endorsed the practice of using coal ash to make concrete. As it turns out, environmentalists largely agree. 

Engineers tend to be advocates. Steve Fleming is technical director for Chicago-based Prairie Materials, a large concrete supplier. And he is a fan of coal ash.

"We add it to our concrete to help with its performance," he says. "Both in its plastic state"— that is, when it’s wet, since coal ash makes concrete easier to work with — "and most important from my point of view, it helps the long-term performance of the concrete as well. It actually increases the strength, and makes the concrete last longer."

As an engineer, Fleming has long appreciated coal ash’s benefits. It took customers longer.

"When I first started, 18-19 years ago, I had a lot of customers who thought that fly-ash was not good," he says. "They said, 'It’s a waste product, and why are you putting it in my concrete?' Now, we have contractors who are requesting fly ash. If we ship them a straight cement mix, they’ll complain."

There are environmental advantages, too. Coal ash has toxins in it: arsenic, lead, mercury. Locking that stuff up in concrete seems safer than letting it sit in landfills or ponds that can contaminate groundwater.

The EPA endorsed using coal ash in concrete after comparing it to the toxins in Portland cement. Turns out, Portland cement is more toxic.

Portland cement is also much worse for the environment. "Portland cement production is one of the major greenhouse-gas sources  worldwide," says Craig Benson, a professor of environmental engineering at the University of Wisconsin.

He explains: Making Portland cement involves applying heat to limestone — which is made of calcium, oxygen and carbon — to get lime: calcium and oxygen.

"That process liberates a lot of carbon dioxide," he says. "That goes right up in the atmosphere."

There are more benefits: Using coal ash means not using resources to dig up limestone. Or burning fuel to heat it up. And because fly ash makes concrete last longer, it also means not replacing the concrete as often.

All of which also means saving money. Benson did a study on that. "It was really remarkable," he says. "Just the economic impact is about $5 billion to our economy."

Lisa Evans, a lawyer for Earthjustice, is reluctant to declare herself a fan of using coal ash for concrete. She’d rather we stop burning coal. Failing that, however, she thinks concrete is a good idea.

"I think characterizing it as a 'win' would be accurate," she says. "If you’re going to make coal ash in the first place, locking it up in concrete is preferable to a lot of the other ways we use or dispose of coal ash."  

But the consensus isn’t perfect. The EPA is currently deciding between two alternatives for regulating coal ash. Evans favors one that would regulate coal ash as hazardous waste, except for designated "beneficial re-uses" like concrete.  

That proposal worries John Ward, a spokesman for the coal-ash recycling industry, who runs a group called Citizens for Recycling First. He thinks the exception would just cause confusion. "How can you call something hazardous on the property of the people who made it," he says, "and expect you to want to use it in your house?"

He thinks that potential confusion could make utilities reluctant to allow recyclers to take coal ash at all.  

Marketplace for Monday April 28, 2014by Dan WeissmannPodcast Title Coal ash = environmental win (when you recycle it)Story Type FeatureSyndication SlackerSoundcloudStitcherSwellPMPApp Respond No

Jewish Man Who Became Radical Islamist Sentenced To Prison

NPR News - Fri, 2014-04-25 14:10

Yousef al-Khattab, who advocated violence against the Jewish community, was sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison.

» E-Mail This

VIDEO: 'Sickening' Wiki posts 'hard to trace'

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:52
The government has launched a full inquiry into who was behind "sickening" changes to a Wikipedia page about the Hillsborough disaster.

VIDEO: Syrian refugee children forced to beg

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:48
Syrian refugee families in Lebanon are being forced to send their children into the streets to beg.

Northampton 18-10 Harlequins

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:41
Northampton Saints secure their place in the Amlin Challenge Cup final by beating three-times winners Harlequins.

In which Dove's 'Real Beauty' campaign faces real backlash

Marketplace - American Public Media - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:38

In Dove's latest advertisement, "Patches," a scientist prescribes a "beauty patch" to women suffering from low self esteem. Over the course of four minutes, the patch-wearing "patients" move from lines like "If I were more confident, I'd have the confidence to approach a guy, maybe," to "I've defintiely opened up something inside of me to make me feel more... great."

Magic! Except spoiler: There's nothing in the beauty patch. Dove's not selling any patches -- they're selling the story of women finding inner beauty, a.k.a., the Dove brand's strategy since 2004. They've sold creams to slow the signs of aging with messages about being "pro age." They've launched self-esteem programs and campaigns critiquing the whole business of advertising. 

A Dove spokesman told Ad Age they created the "Patches" video "to intentionally provoke a debate about women's relationship with beauty." And what a debate they've started: The "Patches" ad has been called patronizing, garbage and at least one word we wouldn't print on our own site. In just one hour Friday morning, at least 500 people watched this parody video:

Dove grew from a $200 million soap brand in the early 1990s into a nearly $4 billion corporation by 2013, selling everything from deodorant to hairspray. They've sold products -- lots of products -- with the message "You are more beautiful than you think." 

Andrea Learned, a communications consultant and author of "Don't Think Pink," a book about marketing to women, says Dove’s original ‘Real Beauty’ campaign turned selling soap into an important cultural dialogue, helping women embrace their bodies—old or young, fat or thin. 

But she thinks the latest campaign has "lost its way. It kind of creeped me out right from the beginning," she says. She thinks the tactic in the video of misleading the female subjects about the treatment they're getting in order to show that really, you are beautiful if you feel beautiful, will alienate many female consumers. She found herself wondering if the real Dove ad might not just be the parody. “Get out of digging this hole for women—of being these incredibly insecure beings," she says. "That is old news.”

Former ad executive Cindy Gallop agrees that the new Dove campaign is "patronizing" and "not credible." She thinks it's a big misstep for Dove's ad agency, Ogilvy & Mather. But she also thinks any publicity can be good publicity—if the brand embraces the criticism and builds on it.

“The fact that they are stimulating dialogue, that we are talking about this, in whatever context, is terrific," Gallop says. "And it’s all tremendous fodder for them to take the campaign forward in an even stronger way next time out of the gate.”

Gallop has a pitch for Dove’s next campaign: real-life men saying what they like in their real-life women. Grey hair, freckles, curves—things most advertisers never portray in their impossible-to-acheive models of female beauty.

Is all this pushback a sign that Dove doesn't have its pulse on what women think any more? What do you think of the campaign? Tell us on Twitter or Facebook

Why it makes economic sense to send a letter for $0.49

Marketplace - American Public Media - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:30

Every other week we try to answer some of the questions that you've submitted for our series, I’ve Always Wondered. This week, we are going to answer a question from listener Mark Robbins: "How is it possible that for less than the price of a cup of coffee, you can send a letter halfway across the globe to a remote island in the South Pacific?" 

Marketplace reporter David Weinberg wanted to know, too. And thus his week-long experiment began: 

Monday: The Post Office's spectacular scale.

Tuesday: How postage gets divided among nations (spoiler: not evenly).

Wednesday: Until the 1960s, it didn't matter if the Postal Service made money.

Thursday: Why the USPS doesn't do email

Friday: How else could we get a message to the people of Tanna? (serious question)

Monday: The Post Office's spectacular scale.

Listener Mark Robbins sent us his question via email. He chose, for his example, the island of Tanna, about a thousand miles west of Australia. I found an address for a bar on the island, and before I sent the letter, I called Robbins to ask if he had anything he'd like to say to the people of Tanna.

“Hello from chilly northeastern Pennsylvania. Wish I were there.”

I dropped the letter in the mailbox with a $1.15 global forever stamp. From there, it was taken to the main Los Angeles sorting facility, a 1 million square foot building  where I met Ken Starks, the acting manager of plant support operations.

And herein lies the answer to Mark’s question: The reason you can send a letter across the ocean for less than the price of a cup of coffee is because of the staggering economy of scale of the USPS.

Take, for example this one machine:

This delivery bar code sorting machine processes 30,000-40,000 pieces of mail per hour. The minimum amount of postage required to send a letter is $0.49. So nearly every day, this one machine processes at least $20,000 in postage revenue per hour. And this is just one of several machines in a single sorting facility.

The USPS handles half of all the mail in the world. In 2013 the postal service generated $65.2 billion in revenue. It has more retail locations in the U.S. than McDonald's, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart combined. It's the second largest employer in the U.S. behind Wal-Mart, and the median salary of a U.S. postal worker is about $53,000.

So for every letter that travels across the globe, there are millions that travel much shorter distances. They subsidize the cost of international letters.

Tuesday: How postage gets divided among nations (spoiler: not evenly).

To send our letter to the island of Tanna, I purchased a global forever stamp for $1.15. By the time it arrives it will have traveled on multiple on-the-ground vehicles and airplanes in multiple countries.

This is what the inside of a postal truck looks like.

David Weinberg/Marketplace

So how does that $1.15 get divided among all nations? Here are the steps:

Step 1: Receive Payment for Postage

The origin country of the letter gets to keep 100 percent of the postage revenue. For now…

Step 2: Weight it

The island of Tanna is in the country of Vanuatu, which is one of the 192 member countries of the Universal Postal Union. At the end of the year, every member of the UPU adds up the weight of all the mail it delivered for other countries.

Step 3: Pay Your Dues

The UPU has established a complicated system of terminal dues that countries pay each other for mail delivered outside its borders. So if the USPS delivered 2,000 kilograms of mail from Vanautu in 2013, and Vanautu only delivered 1,000 kilograms U.S. mail from the U.S., then Vanautu will have to pay terminal dues to the U.S. How does that money get divided up among the multiple countries that handle the letter? 

Google Maps

Short answer: It doesn’t get divided for each individual piece of mail. Instead, countries pay terminal dues based on the overall weight of mail shipped between them.

These rates are decided by The Universal Postal Union.

Wednesday: Until the 1960s, it didn't matter if the Postal Service made money.

And now our letter to Vanuatu takes a moment to ask itself the question: "Why am I not an email?"

The Postal Service is, as they know all too well, losing money

Historian Richard John says, this isn't a new story -- it just didn't matter as much in the country's early days. When the Postal Service was established in 1775 -- with Ben Franklin as the country's first Postmaster -- it functioned as a government agency, with no real mandate to break even.

And as the country expanded, the Postal Service did too. They were often at the forefront of new transportation technologies -- think: stagecoaches, motorcycles, railroads, airplanes, and even missiles.

A city carrier in Washington, D.C., gathers mail from a post-mounted collection box using \"The Flying Merkel,\" a belt-driven, two-cylinder V-twin motorcycle, circa 1911. The use of motorcycles for mail collection and delivery in cities peaked in the 1920s. Four-wheeled automobiles and trucks, with their larger capacities, soon became the vehicles of choice. 

Courtesy of the United States Postal Service

"The Post Office was very quick to give contracts to flyers. Charles Lindbergh. And the airlines got an absolutely essential boost from that postal funding in 1920s and 30s," John says. "In more recent period, the 50s, 60s and 70s, optical scaning recognition are technologies the Post Office [supported]."

How'd they manage to pay for all this innovation?

"Congress used to foot the bill when the institution was running a deficit," John says. "Coroporate money doesn't become important til 1900."

And even then, John says, these external funds competed with "a thought experient about how our nineteenth century forbearers believed politics should be conducted with major federal subsidies to make it possible to spread the news, which remained a central mandate. Newspapers and magazines -- LIFE Magazine was a famously important magazine in 1960s -- was more or less destroyed by changes in postal rates. It got more expensive to mail, and it was no longer economical. So it's a remarkable odyssey for an institution a lot of peope cared about." 

Today's assumption that the postal service should break even took root in the early 1970s. Postal worker strikes prompted then-President Richard Nixon to pass the Postal Reorganization Act in 1971, which turned the agency into a semi-independent business -- and as a semi-independent business, money started to matter. The Postal Service hasn't used taxpayer money since 1982, with a few exceptions, such as sending absentee ballots to Americans overseas. Today, the USPS relies on the costs of postage and sales for almost all of their expenses.

Eddie Hubbard (left) and William E. Boeing stand in front of a Boeing C-700 seaplane near Seattle, Washington, after returning from a survey flight to Vancouver, British Columbia, on March 3, 1919. They brought with them a pouch with 60 letters, making this the first international mail flight.

Boeing Airplane Company/Collection of United States Postal Service

Some say the Postal Service stopped innovating because its business model changed, and the funds simply weren't there.

Tomorrow, we'll talk with someone who thinks the story isn't so simple. 

Thursday: Why the USPS doesn't do email

Why isn’t there an email address available to the public -- one that carries with it the same privacy laws that apply to postal mail?

Shiva Ayyadurai asked USPS management that same question in 1997, the year he calls "The Crossover," when email volume exceeded postal mail volume. At the time, Ayyadurai says the USPS did not see email as a threat to first-class mail. And in 1997, there really was no reason to be concerned -- during the three years leading up to 1997, the USPS posted cumulative earnings of $4.6 billion and, First-Class mail was up by 13 percentage points.

Ayyadurai calls himself the inventor of email, a claim that has been widely disputed, says he has a vested interest in the answer. It would take 15 years of criticism, but in 2012 Shiva Ayyadurai  produced a report, funded by the USPS, outlined several ways for the USPS could integrate email into its business model. Ayyadurai says the USPS did respond after he submitted his research.


Friday: How else could we get a message to the people of Tanna? (serious question)


In all probability, our letter is still on its way to Tanna. 

Which raises the question: How else could we convey Mark's message to this small island nation? What are your ideas, Internet?

Send them to us via Facebook or in the comments below. Or, you know, via snail mail. 

VIDEO: 'Observers seized' in east Ukraine

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:30
Pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine have seized a bus carrying international military observers, Ukraine's interior ministry says.

VIDEO: What has royal tour done for monarchy?

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:27
A royal tour of New Zealand and Australia has drawn to a close with both countries 'broadly content' with keeping the monarchy, according to Nicholas Witchell.

Canada court rejects Senate reform

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:23
The Canadian Supreme Court unanimously rejects the Harper government's plan to reform or abolish the Canadian Senate.

Spain to search for Cervantes body

BBC - Fri, 2014-04-25 13:23
Forensic scientists in Spain are to start scanning a Madrid convent for the body of 17th Century author Miguel de Cervantes.
Beale St. Caravan
Next Up: @ 12:00 am

KBBI is Powered by Active Listeners like You

As we celebrate 35 years of broadcasting, we look ahead to technology improvements and the changing landscape of public radio.

Support the voices, music, information, and ideas that add so much to your life.Thank you for supporting your local public radio station.


Drupal theme by ver.1.4