National / International News

After years of conflict, it can be difficult to imagine the people of Mogadishu enjoying a nightlife.

A long week of scandal has been tough on more than just the White House. President Obama's allies are struggling with how to respond to their first taste of really bad news within the administration.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

The extradition of fugitive Andrew Moran is delayed by an investigation into separate charges by Spanish police.

Gov. Pat Quinn has not said whether he will sign the bill after the state Senate approved the measure, which includes tough guidelines for who is eligible.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

 The IRS scandal is all over the news this week and as we head into the weekend, it's on our minds, too.

Later today, we'll talk to Weekly Wrappers the Guardian's Heidi Moore and the Wall Street Journal's Sudeep Reddy join us to talk over the week that was: the IRS scandal and the debt ceiling letter from Jack Lew, where he says The Treasury "will begin implementing the standard set of extraordinary measures."

Moore says the phrase alone is kind of special.

"You have to love the infinite disappointment in that phrase," she says.

Reddy says try as Republicans might, this isn't a winnng point for them.

"It means that there's very little economic policy that you're going to see discussed in Washington," he says. "You've got the sequester and your'e stuck with an incredibly dumb sequester for the rest of the year, we're stuck with fiscal policy that is working against the extraordinary policy. All that menas we're stuck with very slow growth."

On the good(?) news about the deficit, Heidi says all of the guessing games about the budget are just that: guesses.

"I think what this highlights is it's really difficult to actually know what the budget is doing," she says. "You se all these numbers and they look like science. They look like reality."

Alas, just guesses. She thinks it is good news, though.

"With only a few mild — yet annoying — cuts through the sequesters and through previous cuts to defense and so on, we've already seen the deficit shrink." 

Lastly, those three letters you could not escape this week. IRS. Can President Barack Obama really bounce back?

Reddy says the scandal is taking up precious airtime.

"There's only so much oxygen in this town and we're seeing it sucked up by ...scandal," he says. "We're facing facing a number of longer term issues that aren't going to be adresed because the political oxygen is being sucked up by those three letters (IRS)."

Get ready for the weekend with our #longreads

As always, our Wrappers have a few great articles for you to save for your weekend reading.

Heidi Moore picks:

• On Wall Street, racial and ethnic identity used to be parsed as much as financial ability: for years, there were the firms known for employing established white Anglo-Saxon Protestants and firms known for grabbing up-and-coming Jewish financiers. Times have changed and now there's a new ethnic group establishing itself: highly educated Indian-Americans. My former WSJ colleague Anita Raghavan, takes a look at Rajat Gupta, the former Goldman Sachs director, and others in what she called the "Indian-American elite" in her new book, a really fascinating excerpt of which is running in the New York Times this weekend. It's a close look at how power is wielded on Wall Street. 
• I normally don't go in for "special issues" of magazines because they end up being too precious, but Fast Company has done something really nice with its Most Creative People in Business issue. It's a genuinely instructive, sometimes inspiring tour of how people grow and maintain their creativity even when their jobs start to become about routine. You don't have to be an artiste in a Parisian palette to use creativity; it's a quality that makes anyone happier, even if you only use it in the kitchen, in decorating your home, or in improving your golf game. The American spirit is one of innovation, and in this world when we can control nearly anything from our smartphones, we often forget that we all have it in us to think of something new. 
• This absolutely charming story on the loss of the American apostrophe speaks for itself. It's fabulous and worth it for the "Apostrophe Protection Society" alone. 

Sudeep Reddy points you to:

• "The modern history of swearing: Where all the dirtiest words come from" is Salon's excerpt of a book, "Holy Sh*t," that has few asterisks beyond the title. 
• Colleges and inequality: How strained finances of American universities are widening the class divide, from The Atlantic.
• A broad review of the implications of 3-D printing on manufacturing and intellectual property from Bloomberg.

Proposals for chemical plants to use "inherently safer" design practices have been blocked by industry executives and their allies in Congress, despite deadly accidents and the risk of a potential terrorist attack that could harm an entire community or city.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

Proposals for chemical plants to use "inherently safer" design practices have been blocked by industry executives and their allies in Congress, despite deadly accidents and the risk of a potential terrorist attack that could harm an entire community or city.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

James Anderson can break Ian Botham's England record of 383 Test wickets, says cricket correspondent Jonathan Agnew.

A man accused of abducting and murdering five-year-old April Jones says it never occurred to him to ring 999 for help.

The political arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation wants GOP leaders to set aside legislation like the farm bill that might turn attention away from questions about the IRS and Benghazi.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

Today, Bloomberg -- the financial-information company, not the New York mayor who founded it -- appointed former IBM CEO Samuel Palmisano to oversee an independent review of privacy and data practices.

Bloomberg has been scrambling since it acknowledged last week that its reporters snooped on bankers through Bloomberg Terminals, which feed financial data and are used for trading. Turns out, Bloomberg reporters could see what see what clients were doing on those terminals.

Bloomberg may be known publically for its news service, but the terminals keep the company in business. Banks and companies lease more than 300,000 Bloomberg terminals, each of which costs about $20,000 a year. Goldman Sachs alone has some 5,000 of them.

"When you go to a big trading floor, you’re looking at half an acre of Bloomberg terminals," says Max Wolff, a senior analyst at Greencrest Capital.

Wolff says it's not just the terminals. Between its news service, magazines, data service and other branches of its business, Bloomberg is woven in to the fabric of the finance industry.

"Bloomberg is omnipresent on Wall Street," he says. "Almost everyone in the financial business has some interaction with some part of Bloomberg on a regular basis."

That omnipresence is part of why this breach of trust is so serious, says Ken Doctor, media analyst for Outsell. Bloomberg terminals account for around 85 percent of Bloomberg's revenue.

"It's the center of the business," he says. "It raises that question of: ‘Is that terminal as secure as we thought?’”

Big banks are asking that very question. Bloomberg has been doing damage control with dozens of clients. J.P. Morgan Chase has asked Bloomberg to see logs of its reporters' activities on the terminals, and Citigroup reportedly banned some of its traders from using Bloomberg’s chat service.  

"This could just be a blip,” says Doctor, “but it will be a blip that’s going to be remembered for a long time."

For big banks and smaller firms alike.

"I'm a nerdy guy. Sometimes I have four different Bloomberg Terminals on at once," says Stephen Leeb, president of Leeb Group, a money management firm, and author of several books.

Leeb says he loves the Bloomberg terminal and doesn’t plan to drop it but, but this incident is upsetting.

"I’m just uncomfortable with people knowing I’m interested in how the Chinese currency is behaving. Why should anyone else have the right to know that?” he says. “I might go to other internet sites than Bloomberg for information."

Bloomberg has restricted reporters’ access in the terminals. In a statement today, the company said nothing is more important than its clients' trust and that it's doing everything it can to make sure the issue is addressed.

Controversy has dogged the new DSM-5, what people like to call "the psychiatrist's bible," and it won’t even be officially released until this weekend.

Really, the book is a manual clinicians use to diagnose and classify people with mental illness.

While it sounds pretty dry, there’s a whole lotta drama around this book.

The federal government has questioned its value...some practitioners are boycotting it and there are charges that it’s not ready for prime time.  

Before I say anything more about the DSM-5, here are a couple of facts about the DSM IV.

It's 19 years old and it still brings in about$4-5 million a year.

“It appears to meet a need for many, many people,” says Dr. James Scully who is CEO and medical director of the American Psychiatric Association – which publishes the manual.

And he says with 150,000 pre-orders the DSM-5 is a hot seller.

“We may do a second printing more quickly than we originally thought,” says Scully.

At $199 dollars for the hardcover, $149 for paperback — that’s more than $20 million in sales right there.

It cost the APA $25 million to produce the book. The DSM is so popular because it’s widely considered the book for doctors to define and diagnose mental illness in the United States.

“The DSM franchise has become enormously profitable publishing enterprise,” says Dr. Allen Frances who chaired the team that created the DSM-IV.

Frances is now a DSM critic with a book of his own, ‘Saving Normal.’

He’s concerned the latest manual includes new diagnosis that will drive up healthcare costs.  

Frances also charges that financial pressures – like dwindling membership - are forcing the APA to treat the DSM like a cash cow, not a public trust.

“I don’t think they are doing it for their own personal gain. But I think the association placed a lot of pressure working on DSM 5 to get it out before its time,” he says.   

Scully says the APA stands by its book.

“If we were doing this just to make money, we would do it more often than every 19 years,” says Scully.

Some doctors are boycotting the book. Others just don’t see a need to buy it.

Sandra Steingard is the medical director at a community mental health center in Burlington, Vermont.

“My advice to the agency is I don’t think that’s where our resources are best served,” says Steingard.

The APA doesn’t have much reason to worry right now.

The DSM-5 has been on Amazon’s Top 100 best seller list for more than a month. Today, it’s number 8.

On Saturday, it’ll  be a year ago since Facebook had its IPO.

When it came out the gate, it was valued at about $100 billion dollars making it one of the most highly valued IPOs of all time. The only problem was, it wasn’t making much money. And that had  a lot of investors concerned.

So how’s it doing now?

Let’s start with the co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his famous “hoodie.” Michael Pachter is an analyst at Wedbush Securities.

Before the IPO, he told Bloomberg that, “Mark and his signature hoodie, I mean he’s actually showing investors he doesn’t care that much... and I think that’s a mark of immaturity.”

What does he think today?

“I’m pretty confident that getting married changed him, as it does all of us. The guy just grew up overnight,” Pachter said.

Zuckerberg got married soon after the IPO.

“Since that day, every single time he’s spoken in public he’s talked about monetization. And he talks about better monetizing mobile,” Pachter said.  

That bring us to Wall Street’s changing attitude toward Facebook. At the IPO Facebook didn’t really have a mobile money-making plan, said Clark Fredricksen, a researcher at e-Marketer.

“Last year Facebook went from zero mobile-ad revenues to leading the mobile display ad market by the end of 2012,” he said. Fredrickson expects that by the end of this year, the social network will have about 30 percent of the mobile display-ad market, ahead of Google.

But not everything has worked. In the past year, Facebook introduced lots of products that haven’t really taken off. There’s “gifts,” which allows you to buy stuff for you friends and Home, an app that turns an Android into a Facebook phone Zachary Reiss-Davis, an analyst at Forrester, said Facebook’s success in mobile has bought it some time.

“They clearly want to maintain their status as a nimble company willing to try new things and experiment,” Reiss-Davis said.

So what do the users think? There’s still a lot of talk about how Facebook has to be careful not to be too salesy or it might lose users.

Erica Terry-Derrick has  been on Facebook for about five years now. She knows Facebook is using her data to sell ads but she’s used to it.  

“I just think it’s part and parcel of the world we live in right now,” she said. She adds that it’s just like TV only not as loud.

This week, Green Mountain College in Vermont became the fifth campus around the country to announce it will pull its endowment money from fossil fuel companies. Students on hundreds of campuses are calling on their colleges to take a stand on climate change by divesting from the oil and gas industry.

Now one college has come up with a price tag. Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania estimates fossil fuel divestment could cost its $1.5 billion endowment as much as $200 million in lost returns.

Students at Swarthmore have been stepping up the pressure to divest. A few weeks ago, a group called Swarthmore Mountain Justice stood before the Board of Managers and demanded the college take steps by fall to stop investing its endowment in fossil fuel companies.

“If the Board of Managers does not agree to this timeline, then we will intervene in business as usual,” freshman Nathan Graf told the Board, in a video students posted of the meeting.

Much of Swarthmore’s endowment is pooled with other clients’ money, says Maurice Eldridge, vice president for college and community relations. He says moving it could mean higher fees or lower returns, which could squeeze programs.

“Since our budget is dependent largely on tuition income and endowment income, this could be programmatically quite difficult,” he says.

Dan Apfel is with the Responsible Endowments Coalition. He says Swarthmore is making some false assumptions about divesting.

“There are active managers out there that are willing to screen out fossil fuels from their portfolio,” he says. “Those managers can perform as well as the managers that Swarthmore has in their portfolio now.”

Swarthmore says it cost the college around $2 million to divest from companies doing business in South Africa -- over apartheid -- more than 20 years ago.

Eldridge says the endowment is larger and more complicated today. Students say the costs of not dealing with climate change could be much higher than lost investment returns.

Designer Katie Shelly's upcoming cookbook offers 50 illustrated recipe "blueprints" for basic meals — from simple snacks to more hefty dishes like eggplant Parmesan. She hopes they'll inspire any level of cook to improvise in the kitchen.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

Designer Katie Shelly's upcoming cookbook offers 50 illustrated recipe "blueprints" for basic meals — from simple snacks to more hefty dishes like Eggplant Parmesan. She hopes they'll inspire any level of cook to improvise in the kitchen.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

Even cancer patients with health insurance can face steep copayments for drugs, a sizable share of hospital bills and significant incidental expenses. So wouldn't it make sense for doctors and patients to talk about financial issues up front?

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

It may be the world's second biggest economy, but China can be a tough place to live. There's a new strain of bird flu, toxic food scandals galore and the worst air pollution on record.

Smoggy skies are part of the growing pains of a developing country and China is no exception. But for the ex-pats living and working in China what is it really like to have to breathe polluted air?

Marketplace's Shanghai correspondent Rob Schmitz says he definitely has to make adjustments to his daily life.

"Each day when I wake up I check my phone. Not for email, but to check the air quality. I have an app that gives me hourly readings from the air monitoring station at the U.S. consulate here in Shanghai. I use it to plan my day. For example, whether I'll do my morning run or whether I'll need to turn up the very expensive air filters we bought for the kids' rooms," said Schmitz.

"This year my wife bought the family a bunch of industrial grade filtration masks that we'll sometimes wear outside when the air quality is really bad."

Having to wear sci fi-level filtration masks is pretty extreme, but the pollution levels in Shanghai aren't even as bad as other cities like Beijing. Schmitz said that businesses, both foreign and Chinese, are starting to do something about it.

"I think the changes we're going to see in the business environment are more people leaving Beijing and coming to places like Shanghai or Hong Kong and businesses moving parts of their operations to these cities where pollution isn't as terrible as it is in Beijing."

"Not as terrible" isn't exactly a ringing endorsement for Shanghai, but Schmitz says he doesn't have any plans to leave China just yet.

"We've taken a lot of precautions to protect ourselves and our children but it does weigh on you and it's getting worse. It's something we monitor on a day-by-day basis."

RELATED: Want to see what other major cities around the globe might look like with Beijing quality air? Try out our Smog Simulator.

Following her brief testimony, she broke down and pleaded with the court, "Please bring justice for my daughter." Meanwhile, lawyers for the accused say their clients have been "tortured" since the beginning of the trial.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

Jorge Rafael Videla ruled Argentina from 1976-1983 and orchestrated a "Dirty War" against opponents that killed as many as 30,000 people.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us