A dispute over the title This Town has sparked a mini-controversy worthy of Mark Leibovich's book about ego and excess in Washington, D.C.
Here's something to remember: When most of us buy a home, we're essentially getting help from the government in the form of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They are two government-backed companies that subsidize and underwrite mortgages -- including one that is the bedrock of the real estate market, the 30-year fixed rate. That loan makes up a large part of the U.S mortgage market.
So when we talk about homeownership, we are essentially talking about the 30-year. Because most consumers have used this mortgage to get a home. Right now, Congress is trying to figure out whether it should still exist. Will it go away? Ilyce Glink, a personal finance expert and author, says she can't imagine that ever happening.
"I know that there's been talk about eliminating it, and truth be told, most Americans don't keep their mortgages for 30 years. The typical American household will keep a mortgage for usually somewhere between 5-7 years. But now that mortgage interest rates are near historic lows -- they're not quite at the historic low, but very close to it -- I think we're going to see these mortgages kept for a long time," says Glink.
The government is trying to wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which could really change the mortgage picture out there because most of the new mortgages that have been taken out the last few years have been backed by the two government-backed companies. What could mortgages look like if Fannie and Freddie go private or have a diminished role?
"In its place is going to be a system that I think will look very much like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac except going to be not Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. What will end up happening is that private entities [will] step in and perform this secondary mortgage market function and it'll probably names that you name like Bank of America or Chase. The big banks are going to want a part of this," says Glink.
If you're thinking of buying a house and trying to figure out the financing end of it, what should you expect?
"I think what you'll see with whatever replaces Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are additional charges and fees that are going to go into this. Ultimately that will fall to the buyers. So I think buyers will see mortgages that are going to be more expensive," says Glink. "The costs of mortgages is going to go up. We see interest rates already going up, that's making mortgages more expensive. And I think the fees associated with it are going to go up."
Glink says the super low interest rates we've seen the last few years are a direct result of the economy tanking, and the Federal Reserve buying mortgage-backed securities and other instruments to keep rates low. She says eventually the economy will improve and costs will go up.
In 5-10 years, what might the standard mortgage look like?
"I don't know that there's any way to know right now. But looking out 10 years, if I had to lay odds on it, I would say there will still be a 30-year mortgage. People will still be able to qualify, but they're going to have to qualify based on what they actually earn and can afford to repay," says Glink. "We went through a period where all you needed was a pulse and a good credit score and you could leverage up your income by 10 times. I think those days are gone."
One month after accepting a suspension that ended his season, Milwaukee Brewers outfielder Ryan Braun issued a statement apologizing for his actions. But the note, which was posted online, falls far short of the full disclosure many fans and analysts say they expect from the 2011 National League Most Valuable Player.
The young woman was on a photo shoot with a male colleague in south Mumbai when five men allegedly assaulted her.
Just what did wash up on a beach? At first, there was wild speculation. Now, the thinking is much less dramatic. But check out photos of the rather gross remains found in Spain.
Steve Ballmer became the company's CEO in January 2000. In recent years, Microsoft has come under increasing criticism for not keeping up with the shift to mobile phones.
There were no show-stopping glitches in the stock market Friday. But everyone from day-traders to Securities and Exchange Commission officials were still scratching their heads about Thursday’s “flash freeze” on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange.
One puzzled expert was Michael Goldstein, chairman of the finance department at Babson College. “Why didn’t Nasdaq have a back-up?” he asked.
In many cases, it does. The U.S. has 13 stock exchanges. If one goes down, investors can go through the others. That is, only if they know the stock prices, and what failed Thursday was the system that tells everyone Nasdaq share prices.
“It’s kind of ridiculous,” says Joseph Saluzzi, co-founder of brokerage firm Themis Trading. “It’s a Rube Goldberg machine. Here we call it a fragment maze of destinations.”
The complexity of the exchange system makes it vulnerable, Saluzzi says, and as for a back-up, “As far as we know, that does not exist.”
Nasdaq CEO Robert Greifeld said Friday he agrees that U.S. markets should have a system that backs up stock quotes for all exchanges.
Part of the problem, says Eric Hunsader, founder of market data provider Nanex, is that exchanges haven’t had the incentive to focus on back-up systems for price-sharing programs. That’s because the most lucrative traders don’t need them. They’re so big they have their own.
“Exchanges cater to the high-frequency traders,” he says.
Nasdaq did not respond to a request for comment.
Investors and others are concerned that a single point of failure could close Nasdaq for three hours.
“This is a chokepoint, so you’d thing the chokepoint should have all the redundancy in the world,” says Charles Jones, a Columbia finance professor. Still, he says, no matter how much stock exchanges invest, “I don’t think we’ll ever get to 100 percent reliability.”